Support Amnesty International

 

Cybertelecom
Cybertelecom
Federal Internet Law & Policy
An Educational Project
California
Navigation Links:
Page Sections
- EAS
- Cybercrime
- Muni BB
- - MuniBB Notes
- VoIP

State Links
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming

:: Home ::
:: Feedback ::
:: Disclaimer ::
:: Sitemap ::

Cybercrime

CAL. PENAL CODE § 502 (c) Except as provided in subdivision (h), any person who commits any of the following acts is guilty of a public offense:

  • (1) Knowingly accesses and without permission alters, damages, deletes, destroys, or otherwise uses any data, computer, computer system, or computer network in order to either (A) devise or execute any scheme or artifice to defraud, deceive, or extort, or (B) wrongfully control or obtain money, property, or data.
  • (2) Knowingly accesses and without permission takes, copies, or makes use of any data from a computer, computer system, or computer network, or takes or copies any supporting documentation, whether existing or residing internal or external to a computer, computer system, or computer network.
  • (3) Knowingly and without permission uses or causes to be used computer services.
  • (4) Knowingly accesses and without permission adds, alters, damages, deletes, or destroys any data, computer software, or computer programs which reside or exist internal or external to a computer, computer system, or computer network.
  • (5) Knowingly and without permission disrupts or causes the disruption of computer services or denies or causes the denial of computer services to an authorized user of a computer, computer system, or computer network.
  • (6) Knowingly and without permission provides or assists in providing a means of accessing a computer, computer system, or computer network in violation of this section.
  • (7) Knowingly and without permission accesses or causes to be accessed any computer, computer system, or computer network. (emphasis added)
  • (8) Knowingly introduces any computer contaminant into any computer, computer system, or computer network.
  • (9) Knowingly and without permission uses the Internet domain name of another individual, corporation, or entity in connection with the sending of one or more electronic mail messages, and thereby damages or causes damage to a computer, computer system, or computer network.

Municipal Broadband

VoIP

  • GOVERNATOR! In the Matter of the Application of Time Warner Cable Information Services (California), LLC for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to Provide Facilities-Based and Resale Competitive Local, IntraLATA and InterLATA Voice Service, Application 03-12-031, Opinion (March 13, 2004)
  • California regulators advance VoIP plans, CNET 2/12/2004
  • Order instituting investigation on the Commission's own motion to determine the extent to which the public utility telephone service known as Voice over Internet Protocol should be exempted from regulatory requirements. Feb 11, 2004
  • Press Release Feb 11, 2004 " The California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) today voted to investigate the extent to which Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) telephony should be subject to Commission regulation. The Commission seeks to apply the least amount of regulation needed to fulfill its responsibilities under state law to realize state-mandated policies and objectives on behalf of all California consumers, while simultaneously not impeding the rapid, continued development of VoIP."
  • Feb 11 2004 Agenda
    • Agenda Item 45  [3170]

    • I_________ - Order Instituting Investigation on Commission's own motion to determine the extent to which the public utility telephone service known as Voice over Internet Protocol  should be exempted from regulatory requirements.
    • Investigation on the appropriate regulatory framework for the provision of voice over internet protocol  service in California. Agenda 3127, Item 36 1/22/2004 (Kennedy)Resolution T-16816. Revises the Fiscal Year 2003/2004 Budget and Surcharge Rate for the Deaf and Disabled Telecommunications Program Adopted in Resolution T-16747, January 22, 2004
    • Given the substantial recent publicity given to VOIP and the economic advantages that users desire (lower cost communications), unless the FCC and CPUC are able to regulate such commerce, it seems more prudent to anticipate a reduction in billings rather than an increase. As the determination of a billing base is more of an art than science, we believe the Commission should carefully and immediately begin to monitor the billing base to ascertain the trend of data that is occurring.
  • CPUC VoIP Hearing Report (includes letter to Vonage)
    • California PUC sent letters reportedly to 5 service providers demanding that "file an application with the Commission for authority to conduct business as a telecommunications utility no later than October 22, 2003."  The companies are VoicePulse, the others are Net2Phone, Packet8, SBC Communications and Vonage.
  • Order Instituting Rulemaking on the Commission's Own Motion into the Service Quality Standards for All Telecommunications Carriers and Revisions to General Order 133-B, R. 02-12-004 Order Instituting Rulemaking p. 27-28 Cal PUC December 5, 2002
    • We have jurisdiction to apply our service quality rules to any intrastate telecommunications service, including any services using Internet Protocol (IP) telephony. Anticipating this emerging technology, we intend for the rules we adopt in this proceeding to apply to similar services regardless of the technology used to provide the service.

    • We seek comment on whether the measures and standards proposed for telecommunications services using traditional technologies are adequate and appropriate for application to services that use IP telephony. We seek comment on whether additional measures are needed for telecommunications services offered over an IP platform.
  • Trials and Market Deployments
    • In the Matter of the Application of Time Warner Cable Information Services (California), LLC for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to Provide Facilities-Based and Resale Competitive Local, IntraLATA and InterLATA Voice Service, Application 03-12-031, Opinion (Dec. 22, 2003).
    • TW has applied for approval for market deployment Cablecos Set Sights on VoIP, Xchange February 1, 2004

    Cable Open Access

    EAS

     

    Web services provided by Wyoming.com
    : Home : About Us : Contact Us : Sitemap : Discussion : Search : Newsletter : RSS :
    : ADA : Broadband : Crime : Copyright : DNS : ECommerce : EGovt : First Amendment : Digital Divide :
    : Network Neutrality : Intl : Privacy : Security : SPAM : Statistics : VoIP : Vote : And Much More! :
    :: Feedback : Disclaimer ::
    © Cybertelecom ::