End to End E2E

• The End of End to End?, Potaroo 4/24/2008
• van Schewick, Barbara. 2004. "Architecture and Innovation: The Role of the End-to-End Arguments in the Original Internet." PhD Dissertation. Technical University Berlin .
• Jonathan Zittrain, “Internet Points of Control,” 43 Boston College Law Review 653 (2003).
• Paul A. David -- The Beginnings and Prospective Ending of 'End-to-End'  2002
• Christian Sandvig, Communications Infrastructure and Innovation:  The Internet as End 2 End Network that Isnt, Nov 2002
• B Carpenter IETF Information RFC 2275, Internet Transparency (Feb 2000)
• Reed, David P., Jerome H. Saltzer & David D. Clark. 1998. "Active Networking and End-to-End Arguments." IEEE Network , 12(3): 69-71.
• John Roberts, The Defense Data Network, (1987) ("The DDN has several security features that prevents compromise of user's data. The ISTs and host circuits on each end will eventually have link encryption devices. In the classified portion of the DDN, encryption devices will separate different security levels of classified data.")
• J.H. Saltzer, David Clark, David Reed, End to End Arguments in System Design (Apr. 8, 1981)
• J. H. Saltzer, D. P. Reed, and D. D. Clark, End-to-End Arguments in System Design, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (November 1984) PDF; in ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 2(4): 277-288. 1984 Version:
• The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World by Lawrence Lessig [Amazon]
• Conference:  The Policy Implications of E2E Dec 1, 2000 Stanford
• Active Networking and End-To-End Arguments, Comment, David P. Reed, Jerome H. Saltzer, and David D. Clark
• e2e Map, Yochai Benkler
• The End of End-to-End: Preserving the Architecture of the Internet in the Broadband Era, Mark A. Lemley and Lawrence Lessig
• End-to-End Arguments in System Design, J. H. Saltzer, D. P. Reed, and D. D. Clark
• Comments at E2E, Gerald Faulhaber  [doc | pdf]
• Rethinking the Design of the Internet: The End to End Arguments vs. the Brave New World, David Clark and Marjory Blumenthal
• Brian Carpenter, RFC 1958, Architectural Principles of the Internet (June 1996)"
  • 2.1 Many members of the Internet community would argue that there is no architecture, but only a tradition, which was not written down for the first 25 years (or at least not by the IAB). However, in very general terms, the community believes that the goal is connectivity, the tool is the Internet Protocol, and the intelligence is end to end rather than hidden in the network. The current exponential growth of the network seems to show that connectivity is its own reward, and is more valuable than any individual application such as mail or the World-Wide Web. This connectivity requires technical cooperation between service providers, and flourishes in the increasingly liberal and competitive commercial telecommunications environment. The key to global connectivity is the inter-networking layer. The key to exploiting this layer over diverse hardware providing global connectivity is the "end to end argument"."
  • "3.1 Heterogeneity is inevitable and must be supported by design. Multiple types of hardware must be allowed for, e.g. transmission speeds differing by at least 7 orders of magnitude, various computer word lengths, and hosts ranging from memory-starved microprocessors up to massively parallel supercomputers. Multiple types of application protocol must be allowed for, ranging from the simplest such as remote login up to the most complex such as distributed databases.
• Links
  • Internet Research Task Force (IETF & ISOC) End-to-End