Cybertelecom :: An Open Law Project

About us
Please Link to us!
RSS

Site Map

230
504
508
706
Advertising
ACPA
ADA
Backbones
Broadband
Cable
CALEA
CDA
CIPA
Comp Inquiry
Comm Act 34
Common Carrier
Content
COPA
Copyright
Crime
Crypto
Dig Divide
DSL
DMCA
DNS
Ecommerce
ECPA
eGovernment
Email
Environment
Erate
Fair Use
Fiber
First Amendment
Forbearance
Fraud
Gambling
History
Industry
Info Service
International
Net History
IPv6
Linking
Media
Muni BB
Net Neutrality
Open Access
Power Line
Privacy
Security
SPAM
Statistics
Taxes
Telephone
Timeline
Trademark
Universal Service
VoIP
WHOIS
Wireless
Wiretap

Proceeds from Cybertelecom go to support good things. March's proceeds went to National Resources Defense Council .

Steal More Wifi, part 2! Charlie the Unicorn pulls up to parking lot of the local coffee house driving his convertible Mustang (what else would he be driving). He opens his laptop, finds an open WiFi network, and searches eBay in the hopes of finding that new kidney that he so desparately needs. Pop quiz: What law has Charlie broken?

Taking a Shot in the Dark at Jurisdiction :: Pop Quiz: If Inspector Clouseau from New York found a Smart Fortwo Coupe on eBay for sale by Cato in New Jersey, and called Cato from New Hampshire to make the deal, and then wired Cato the money from New Mexico, and Cato had no other contact with New York, could the good Inspector sue Cato in a New York court?

NSFNET: The Partnership that Changed the World
On November 29 & 30, in Washington DC was an NSFNET Celebration. It was an oral history project. Almost all of the primary people from the primary organizations (NSF, MERIT, IBM, MCI) were present, retelling the NSFNET Story. I was fascinated. It is, like so many things, like looking a picture in black and white, and then seeing the same picture in color. So much was added to my understanding of the history. Things like - the "network of network?" - that was NSFNET. NSFNET established the network hierarchy and "tiers." The roots of NSF's use of "cooperative agreements" and how that created the foundation of future policy struggles. This was not, after all, a simple R&D and transfer of technology project that NSF funded. This was, as the NSFNET Final Report stated, communications infrastructure, vital to the success of our economy and culture. At any rate, all this led to significant revisions to CT's history section. Take a look; give feedback!

Caselaw Construing 47 USC 230 Immunity is Surprisingly Scant
At least according to one Arizona Superior Court: Children of America v. Magedson , CV 2007-003720 (AR Superior Court Oct. 31, 2007). The court's order itself is "surprisingly scant," thus we know little of the facts surrounding this case. What we do know is that once again it involves Ripoffreport .com. Jinkees ! The Sec. 230 caselaw for this one defendant is surprisingly robust . Ripoffreport .com must have some well paid attorney on retainer that does little more than mash the print button for the proforma Sec. 230 Motion to Dismiss form... merely taking a bit of time to scrawl in the name of the latest plaintiff.

What's Google Upsidedown???
According to Dylan Stephen Jayne, it's his social security number. Kinda-a-bummer, if true. Dylan certainly thought it was a bummer, so he sue Google - for $5 Billion - for a civil rights violation pursuant to 42 USC s 1983. Dylan Stephen Jayne v Google Internet Search Engine Founders , No 3:07cv1677 (MDPA Sept 27, 2007).

Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas Believes "FCC" Violates its Trademark
Some guy in the United States has a website FCC.COM where he displays information relevant to the Federal Communications Commission. FCC.COM describes itself as "the place for all news and information regarding the Federal Communications Commission." November 11th 's top FCC related articles included China Vows Major Doping Crackdown , Clinton Says Immigrant Licenses Depends on State, and Black Fence Sparks Dispute. Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas in Spain took issue with FCC.COM and brought a claim before WIPO under the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy .

The Right to Whine :: Global Royalties, Inc., v Xcentric Ventures, LLC, (DAR October 10, 2007)
So a Canadian Mountie walks into a bar in Arizona and says to the bar tender, "I hear this guy that you have never heard of, who doesn't work for you, and who you dont control, walked in here the other day and bad mouthed a Canadian company. Since you didnt tell him to hush-up, we're going to hold you responsible. "

A Perfectly Clear Long Arm Jurisdiction Case :: Weldon-Francke v. Fisher , 06CV0386 (14 th TX Ct of App Sept. 11 , 2007)
I love Internet long-arm jurisdiction cases: they are a mire of how the judiciary deals with a defendant that has made itself available in every forum everywhere all the time all over the globe. No matter how judges grapple with notions of due process, you always are left with the feeling that one party or another got screwed. And it is wonderful to watch old school judges who grew up driving VWs grapple with this new environment, flipping through one failed metaphor after another in an attempt to pigeon-hole what would be "fair" on the Internet. There are no easy or clear cases on the sliding scale of Internet long arm jurisdiction. Except this one.

26¢ Emails - Regulated by the FCC
Time to use the Way-Back Machine. The time is 1977. The country is in a tailspin. Saturday Night Live is singing carols about killing Gary Gilmore for Christmas. President Carter takes the Oval Office and pardons Vietnam War draft evaders. The Clash releases their debut album. And the USPS is scared.
   The USPS has learned about this thing called electronic mail and electronic transactions. It occurs to the USPS that if everyone were to use these electronic thingies, First Class mail would get wiped out and so would all that revenue. After some careful strategic planning, the USPS launched an attack on email with a classic pincer movement: on the left flank, the USPS initiated its own email service known as E-COM; on the rank flank, the USPS considered banning all private email service.

The Sliding Scale Jurisdiction Test: Sliding toward Jurisdiction (Crummey v. Morgan, et al, 2007 CW 0087 (LA App 1st Cir. Aug. 8 2007))
Faced with the conundrum of Internet jurisdiction, the judiciary has created a sliding scale. At the one end of this scale is purely passive sites which simply provide information and offer no level of interactivity (and if you can find any of these "purely passive" sites any more, it belongs in a museum). At the other end of the scale is the fully interactive site such as an ecommerce site where the visitor can interact with an inventory, establish a relationship with the website's company, purchase goods and services, find the status of those goods pending delivery, and provide a review of how good the product was. In between we have the fudge. If I set up an ecommerce business and sell 1 million books to Salem, Massachusetts, seems like I am purposefully availing myself of that jurisdiction. But if I put up one book for sale for whoever wants it on Craigslist, did I really intend to do business with Puritans? The sliding scale is in place because there is a certain degree of ambiguity involved.

The Communications Decency Act is Dead; Long Live the Communications Decency Act! :: Zango v. Kaspersky Labs :: Good Samaritans The Communications Decency Act (CDA) was Congress' first attempt to censor the Internet. This new law plummeted to earth in a flame of glory, struck down as unconstitutional by a unanimous Supreme Court. And by struck down, we mean, of course, the legislation is alive and well, having tremendous impact over the evolution of the Internet, and who gets sued for what.

In Which It Is Asked, Is It Possible to be Online and Not Be "Commercial"? Aitken v. Communications Works of America: Pop quiz: What does the word "commercial" mean on the Internet? Chose one:

  1. Whatever a judge chooses it to mean - neither more nor less.
  2. The sale of goods or services.
  3. A link to someone else's website, with whom you have no relationship, which happens to sell t-shirts.
  4. A protest by a Union against a corporation where the Union impersonates officers of the corporation.

Stealth Trademarks: Search Trigger-Terms: Finally, we look at trigger-terms used in association with search engines. Courts face a conundrum of whether these invisible terms are "in use." One pile of courts cannot conceive of how a trademark can be "in use" if it cant be seen in association with anyone's product. Other courts skip this question, supposing that it is "in use," but finding that there are no confused consumers. Basically it comes down to metaphysics: If a tree falls in the forest, and no one hears it, does it make a noise? Likewise, if a trademark is used in a search engine and no one sees it, is it in use?

Stealth Trademarks: Pop Up Ads: The advent of Pop-Up Ads has introduced a new version of Whack-a-Mole, as computer users spin their mice across the screen attempting to bop the pop. As annoying as these things may be to the computer user, consider the poor website owner that must suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous pop-up ads from his competitor, flung across his beautifully designed webpage. There must be something untoward about this! It must be a trademark violation!

Stealth Trademarks: Is it wrong for me to use your trademark? Is it wrong for me to use your trademark if no one sees me use your trademark?? This three part post explores the caselaw that has considered the use of trademarks in metatags, pop-ups, and keyword advertisements.

Join the Cybertelecom-l online discussion, or
Subscribe to the Cybertelecom News, a daily newsletter filled with the latest news, notices, and pronouncements.

Encrypted Hard Drives Cracked

:: Proceedings ::

RFC :: FCC :: NPRM Telephone Number Requirements for IP Enabled Services Providers. Comments Due Mar. 24. Replies Due Apr 21, 2008.

Funding :: USDA Distance Learning and Telemedicine Program applications due Apr 14

RFC :: FCC :: Request for Clarification that Internet Speech to Speech is a form of TRS. Comments Due after Fed Reg publication.

RFC :: FCC :: Joint Petition for a Declaratory Ruling that Text Messages are a Title II Service and fall under anti discrimination provisions. Comments Due Feb. 13, Mar 14, 2008. Replies Due Mar. 14. Apr. 14.

RFC :: FCC :: FCC Examining Forbearance Petition Review Process. Comments Due FR + 30; Replies due FR + 45.

:: Cool Stuff ::
:: News ::

The hope of a secure and livable world lies with disciplined nonconformists who are dedicated to justice, peace and brotherhood. 
-- Martin Luther King, Jr.

:: Calendar ::

More :: Social Media Conferences :: FCBA :: ISOC :: Interfaith Calendar (avoid scheduling big events on religious high holidays)

Google
Web www.cybertelecom.org

RSS.
© Cybertelecom.